Eminent Domain
Eminent Domain Abuse

Renters Insurance  | Apartment Insurance  Homeowners Insurance |  Landlord Insurance 
 Foreclosure Notices |  Landlord Books Property Management   |  Join Rentlaw.com FREE!

 
Rentlaw.com  

  TOOLS:..   Landlord | Tenant  | Statutes  | Eviction | Buy  | Sell  | Invest 

FIND:..   The Law | Apartment  A Home |   Mortgage   Insurance  |   Attorney  |   Our Blog
LEARN:..  PETS | Real Estate School | Tax Deductions   | Credit   | Glossary1031 Exchange
Features
Real Estate School
Contact Rentlaw.com


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is a "public use"?

One possible challenge to the government's right to take can be raised where the project for which the property is being taken is not for a "public use."  The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution  allow private property to be taken by eminent domain only for a "public use."

The term "public use" has been interpreted very broadly by the Courts.  The project need not be actually open to the public to constitute a public use.  Instead, generally only a public benefit is required.  Elimination of blight through redevelopment projects, for example, is a public benefit which courts have held satisfies the "public use" requirement of the Federal Constitution.  This is true even though the property will typically be transferred to a private redeveloper and may never be open to the general public.  It usually doesn't matter if the redeveloper may be doing nothing more than building a new mall or a complex of movie theaters.

 

Eminent Domain

BOOK: Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain

 · castlecoalition.org
· Institute for Justice      See more here>

Eminent Domain

BOOK: Private Property and the Constitution - a good read - explores the social and economics of Eminent Domain. What is "for the good of mankind...".  Are we robbing land from one to give to another - more mighty, more powerful? Who has a right to their land?  Take a "look inside" this book and read some excerpts-  
When a buyer and a seller negotiate a price for property, they often discuss the prices similar properties have sold for in the recent past. Similarly, appraisers use sales of similar properties that have taken place at or near the date of value to help arrive at an opinion of value for the subject property. These similar properties have been referred to as "comparables." Frequently, there are disagreements over whether these "comparable" sales involved property that is really equivalent to the property whose price is being negotiating. When each expert witness gave you his or her opinion as to the fair market value of the property in this case, he or she based his or her opinion largely on the prices actually paid in sales of other properties. You must decide the usefulness of the evidence of each sale in determining the market value of the property taken in this case. [For example, if an expert based his or her opinion on prices paid for other properties that you do not think are similar to this property, and the expert did not properly account for such differences in his or her analysis, his or her opinion of the fair market value should not be given much weight in your deliberations.]
    Here are some of the questions you may consider in deciding if the sale price of other property is helpful.
    1)    Is the other property of similar size?
    2)    Does the other property have a similar location?
    3)    How close to the date of taking was the other sale?
    4)    Were both the buyer and seller negotiating freely?
    The experts have mentioned other factors to show the similarity or dissimilarity of other sales.
    It is up to you to sort out the differences with what you think a buyer and seller, freely negotiating at arm's length, would consider in arriving at a sale price for the property taken in this case. Give the evidence on each of those other sales whatever weight you think it deserves in determining the market value of this property
C.    Income Approach - People often buy property as income-producing investments and the property's income stream is another way of measuring a property's fair market value. Another way to look at it is to see what an investor would pay for a piece of property in order to get income over time. For instance, suppose he or she decides to invest in real estate and knows that he or she could generally expect a seven percent per year return from such an investment. That means that on an investment of one hundred dollars he or she could expect to receive income of seven dollars per year. If he or she invests one hundred thousand dollars, he or she could expect to receive seven thousand dollars income every year. Suppose he or she is considering the purchase of a piece of property that provides seven thousand dollars a year in rental income after all expenses. He or she should be willing to pay one hundred thousand dollars for that property because that is the amount necessary to invest in order to get an annual income of seven thousand dollars.
    The expert witnesses have referred to this way of arriving at the property's value as the “capitalization of income” formula because it gives you the amount of money or capital that should be invested to purchase the property in order to receive the income which the property produces. 

    As you have heard, experts can differ as to [indicate here as appropriate: the rate of return; the property's potential or anticipated net income on the date of taking, i.e., the income that could have been expected if the property were available for lease on the date of Experts can even disagree as to the importance of the capitalization approach in arriving at a fair market value of the property.

[Discuss contentions of parties here]

    When you consider evidence concerning the income produced by the property, you should only consider it as it affects the market value of the property. [Insert name of property owner(s) here] is not entitled to be paid extra for losing income after the date of taking, because he or she will be fully compensated for his r her lost income by receiving the property's fair market value.

     D.    Cost Approach  The market value of the property may be influenced by the value of the structures on it. The value of the structure(s) is a factor that may affect market value. You must determine the value of the land as enhanced by the value of the structures on it. Suppose that the highest and best use of farm land might be to develop it into residential building lots. In that case, a barn would not enhance the value of the land at all. In fact, it might even reduce the value of the land because of the expense necessary to tear it down so that houses could be constructed.
    Suppose, however, that someone interested in buying property wants to use it for a home and the property already has a house on it. It is logical to assume that such a house would enhance the value of the property; certainly, the buyer would want to know how much the house itself is worth; that is, the reproduction cost of the building -- how much it would cost to build one like it, less the wear and tear, or depreciation, the building has suffered
What is Eminent Domain? Can your property simply be taken from you?

 

"Eminent domain" (also called "condemnation") is the power of government agencies to acquire property for "public use" so long as the government pays "just compensation." Recognized public uses for which the power of eminent domain may be used include, among other things, schools, parks, roads, highways, subways, fire and police stations, public buildings, and the elimination of blight through redevelopment (as in Asbury Park - or not?) A key attribute of eminent domain is that the government can exercise its power of eminent domain even if the owner does not wish to sell his or her property. 

Can one challenge the government's right to acquire property?

Even though the vast majority of government agencies possess the power of eminent domain, on occasion, a successful challenge to the government's right to take a particular property for a particular project can be made. You should be cautioned, however, that such challenges are the exception, not the rule, and usually result only in a delay, rather than outright prevention of the government's right to take.

Typical challenges to the right to take are for failure of the government to follow the proper procedural steps towards eminent domain. If the government fails to follow the proper procedures, a right to take challenge is sometimes possible. Again, however, it must be remembered that the circumstances allowing a successful challenge to the right to take are rare. Each case must be evaluated on its own facts and experienced eminent domain counsel should be consulted. Seeking compensation for the taking, rather than challenging the government's right to take, will be the property owner's usual remedy.

 Also see: Our Commercial Real Estate Glossary and our Appraisal Guide

Eminent Domain
Rentlaw.com Guide

Homeowners & Condo Insurance Click for Info
Free Guide-Quotes

Renters Insurance Apartment 
Condo or Home 
Click Here  
Free Guide-Quotes

Insurance Quotes

Select Insurance
Enter Zip Code

then

SAVE TODAY!

REITs
Real Estate Investment Trusts
Click to Learn More

 
Partners
ReligionStore.com
TvShowStore.com
Dormworld.com
Asburyboardwalk.com